more AI visibility when pages cite sources, stats and quotes — the core GEO finding (Princeton).
ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity are the new front page. We'll tell you — free — whether they recommend you or your competitor.
Free. No catch. Back in your inbox within 48 hours.
More and more buyers never see a list of links — they ask an AI and act on the answer. If you're not in that answer, you're not in the running. GEO is how you get back in.
more AI visibility when pages cite sources, stats and quotes — the core GEO finding (Princeton).
of domains ChatGPT cites are also cited by Perplexity. Every engine is a different game.
answer engines we check you across — by hand, then ask each one what it says about you.
Being cited by ChatGPT tells you almost nothing about Perplexity or Gemini — their answers barely overlap. So we check you across all of them, not "AI" in the abstract.
No jargon, no 80-tab spreadsheet. Eight plain-English signals, each one a reason AI either recommends you — or quietly recommends someone else.
If GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot can't reach you, you literally can't be cited.
Machines read schema, not vibes. Clean markup lets AI lift your facts without guessing.
Does AI know who you are as a 'thing' — not just a string of words on a page?
AI lifts a 40–60 word answer from the top of a page. Do yours give it one?
AI trusts pages with named authors, real credentials and primary sources.
AI repeats what the wider web says about you — Reddit, Wikipedia, YouTube, press.
Stale pages quietly lose citations to newer competitors. We flag what's aging out.
We actually ask the engines about you — and show you who they cite instead.
What ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Perplexity say about you today — and who they cite instead of you.
Red / amber / green on every signal that decides whether AI recommends you — so you see the gaps at a glance.
Prioritised, plain-English, with the why behind each. Quick wins first — not an 80-row spreadsheet.
Where the rivals you name are winning AI mentions you're not — and what it would take to close it.
Read the report, do nothing, we're still glad we met. No drip campaign, no pressure, no card.
We run the engines and read your site by hand. It's a real audit — back in your inbox within 48 hours.
Some of you will want us to fix what we find. That's the bet — and why we can do the audit for free.
We don't just pitch GEO — we bet on it. Weightless AI, our own venture, is built to be found by the engines, with our name on the line.
Drop your URL and we'll get to work. Back within 48 hours — free.
Prefer email? hey@artyreal.com
We'll dig into your site and email your findings within 48 hours — no strings.
A confirmation just landed in your inbox.
Yes — genuinely. No card, no trial, no catch. A free GEO audit is how we open conversations with brands we'd like to build with. If you love what you see and want us to fix things, great. If not, the report is yours to keep.
We turn audits around within 48 hours of your submission. It's hand-done, so if we're slammed we'll email you a heads-up — but 48 hours is the promise we hold ourselves to.
SEO gets you ranking in a list of blue links. GEO — Generative Engine Optimization — gets you cited inside the AI answer itself, when someone asks ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity. Different signals, different game, and most sites are optimised for one and invisible to the other.
Just your URL to start. Telling us a couple of competitors and what you're trying to win helps us tailor the audit, but it's optional. We don't need logins or access to anything.
Often, yes. A lot of GEO fundamentals — clean schema, answer-first content, real authorship, fast crawlable pages — also lift classic SEO and Google's own AI Overviews. We'll flag where the two overlap.
No. The whole audit is run from the outside, exactly how an AI engine sees you — your live pages, your markup, your public footprint. If we end up working together, we might ask for more then.
ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews & AI Mode, Gemini and Perplexity as the core four, plus a read on Claude and Copilot. We check all of them because they barely overlap — being cited in one says little about the others.
It's yours to run with — your team can action the fixes directly. If you'd rather we implement them, we'll scope it with you. Otherwise there's no follow-up unless you ask for one.